Join our FREE personalized newsletter for news, trends, and insights that matter to everyone in America

Newsletter
New

‘i Was Coerced Into Living On My Abuser’s Drive – The Judge Didn’t Believe Me’

Card image cap

After Alice was abused by her husband, the Family Court dismissed her (Picture: Getty Images)

To outside observers, Alice* had the perfect life.

She lived in a house on her husband’s family farm, had stables and horses, and worked in a school.

But behind closed doors, that upper-middle class dream had long since turned into a nightmare.

Because her now ex-husband had spent almost two decades subjecting her to a campaign of psychological and financial abuse

When Alice went to seek justice, the Family Court system offered her no respite – only more ‘trauma’.

Alice is not alone. A new report by Right to Equality shows that the majority of Family Court cases see ‘at least one’ instance of victim-blaming language or attitudes by the judge.

Dr. Charlotte Proudman is the founder and director of Right to Equality who conducted the report (Picture: John Nguyen/JNVisuals)

‘My husband made me feel unloved, demeaned and like I had no value whatsoever,’ Alice told Metro. 

‘I was constantly belittled,’ Alice said. ‘I wasn’t allowed to have an opinion about anything, and if I did he would storm off.

‘I was constantly on edge, because there was nothing genuine, nothing nice, nothing complimentary. It was just an ongoing coldness.

‘You start being silent, because you don’t want a reaction.’

This Is Not Right

On November 25, 2024 Metro launched This Is Not Right, a campaign to address the relentless epidemic of violence against women.

With the help of our partners at Women's Aid, This Is Not Right aims to shine a light on the sheer scale of this national emergency.

You can find more articles here, and if you want to share your story with us, you can send us an email at vaw@metro.co.uk.

Read more:

Alice has children with her ex-husband, now in their late teens and early twenties. 

Her ex-husband’s family were also involved in Alice’s mistreatment. She said: ‘It was like they wanted my daughter to be theirs when she was born. They would come and take her from me without asking.’ 

While Alice tried to protect her children from seeing the abuse, in later years they started to experience it too. 

‘My son says if he’s done something well, his dad either says nothing at all or bellittles it and wants to put him back in his little place,’ she explained.

But the mistreatment wasn’t just emotional. Alice was also experiencing an insidious form of control, known as economic abuse.

‘I didn’t have my own bank account, all of the money I earned would go to him.

‘I had a joint account with him that had limited money in it, for the family shopping and things, but I would have to go back to him with receipts so he could check what I bought.’

Alice said he often justified his control over their finances due to the farming culture they were both part of. 

‘I’d allowed him to do that, and it was seen as quite normal. But I had no independence.’ 

When Alice’s husband later said he wanted time apart, saying he ‘hadn’t loved’ her for 10 years, he ordered that she move out of the family home into a small cottage on the farm’s grounds, and insisted that the children would remain with him.

‘They were only 200 metres away, but it was like I was discarded as a mother. 

‘I would rarely see them, and I wasn’t allowed in the house.

‘I’d given everything, every bit of me – I worked long hours, I renovated our home, I did the gardening, I brought up the children. Still it wasn’t good enough.’

Alice describes feeling ‘belittled’ and like she ‘had no value whatsoever’ (Picture: Getty Images)

Later, he gave her a consent agreement, which he ‘demanded’ that she sign.

A consent agreement is a contract which parties sign to agree to a settlement without going through a full trial. Once it is voluntarily signed by both parties and submitted to a court, it becomes a legally binding consent order.

‘He kept saying, “Trust me, I’ll look after you, don’t worry about anything.” So, what happened was I ended up signing the consent order that he had compiled, and I didn’t even read it.

‘I was fog-brained from the trauma of the abuse and not thinking clearly.’

‘I just wanted an end to everything. I wanted to disappear. I was borderline suicidal, but my children helped my find a way to keep going.’

Then, Alice began seeing a therapist, who she spoke through her experience. The therapist diagnosed her with complex PTSD.

‘When she started to explain what narcissistic abuse looks like, I began to get some clarity. I realised that what she was describing was exactly what I had been experiencing for years.’

While on her journey of understanding what she had been through, Alice knew she needed to face the consent agreement she had signed.

‘I started to look into it, and what I’d agreed to was to stay in the cottage for the rest of my life, but if I moved out it wouldn’t belong to me.’

The consent agreement outlined that Alice would receive a sum of money if she moved out, but this would not be enough to buy a property or be self-sufficient long term.

‘I suppose he was just keeping me where he wanted to keep me, while he was on dating websites and seeing new women.

Alice decided to appeal the consent agreement at court.

‘When my barrister first saw my consent order, he said he’d never seen anything like it. He couldn’t believe that it had been agreed to by the judge.’

Not only had Alice been coerced into signing the document, but her ex-husband had refused to produce details on his finances, or when he had, many figures had been wrong.

‘The judge said we couldn’t discuss coercive control and emotional abuse, so we tried to get it nullified by proving that my ex-husband’s non-disclosure invalidated the document.’

The court process was ‘traumatising’ for Alice.

‘I was interrogated by the opposition legal team for two days, and I had to go out twice because I was shaking, I couldn’t speak.

‘I was told that I had a roof over my head, and I should be grateful.’

Victim blaming in the family courts is widespread (Picture: Getty Images/500px)

Unfortunately, Alice’s experience of being discredited in court is all too common.

The report by Right to Equality shows that of 91 published family law judgements in England and Wales, 66 were found to show bias against the victim, through discrediting, behavioural blame and trivialisation.

‘I have no happy experience of court. I never once felt believed about anything. I felt like the court was set up to protect him, his business, and the farm.

‘It felt like a man’s world in there.

‘When we came out of that hearing and I lost again, I just couldn’t do it anymore. I was done,’ Alice admitted.

‘Too many people assume all abuse is physical. 

‘But I had been manipulated and belittled for so many years, and I was no longer a person I recognised. This is why the courts can’t seem to handle it, because they don’t understand, which in my opinion only serves to enable abusers to get away with it.’

In the end, Alice and her ex-husband reached an agreement out of court, securing her enough to buy her own place.

Alice is still living on her ex-husband’s drive, but has managed to buy a property which she will move into soon. ‘The settlement has bought me a cottage with three bedrooms so I can have a room each for my children to stay with me,’ she said.

However, using her pension to fund her legal representation, she is now left in a very uncertain position.

‘I’m in my late fifties and I am starting again. It’s really, very scary.

‘I have no security. I have anxiety every morning when I wake up. I’m literally hand to mouth, worrying about how to pay the next bill.

‘But, it’s been five years of not having a single breakfast with both of my children. It goes against all your instincts as a mother, when things like that are taken from you.

‘I’m looking ahead to when the normal things can happen again.’

*Name has been changed

Courts need to stop punishing women for the actions of their abusers

By Rachael Clegg, Head of Residentials (Women and Families), Phoenix Futures

A mother escapes an abusive relationship, asks for help with her recovery and is honest about the contact her former partner has had with her. Too often, instead of being supported, she is punished.

A new report from Right to Equality found concerning evidence of victim-blaming in family court judgments, stating that 72.5% of 91 judgments in England and Wales contained judicial victim-blaming with mothers scrutinised more harshly than fathers. Sadly, this reflects what my colleagues and I see every day supporting women recovering from addiction, many of whom turned to drugs or alcohol after experiencing domestic abuse.

These women are often blamed for failing to protect their children from the very men who abused them. They are expected to make impossible decisions while living in fear, and when they seek help or admit they are struggling, that honesty can be used against them.

At Phoenix Futures, a charity that exists to support those experiencing addiction problems through a range of residential and community-based interventions, we’ve seen women disclose contact from an abusive former partner because they want professionals to have the full picture, only to be criticised for not keeping their children safe.

We’ve seen mothers, who often turn to drugs or alcohol to numb the pain after intense trauma, seek treatment for addiction, taking a brave first step towards recovery, but fear that asking for help will instead lead to their children being removed.

One woman we supported lost her children after having two phone calls with her abusivereferr former partner. He had initiated the contact using coercion and threats, yet her honesty about what had happened counted against her. She was responding well to treatment and engaging fully with domestic abuse support but ultimately paid the price for her abuser’s actions.

Protecting children must always come first. But protecting children and supporting mothers should not be seen as opposing goals. We know women face the greatest risk when leaving abusive relationships, yet they are often expected to leave immediately without the practical safety measures they need to do so.

At Phoenix Futures, we’ve seen how keeping mothers and children together in specialist residential rehabilitation, where it is safe and appropriate, can help families recover and rebuild their lives. It may sound controversial at first, but this is a tried and tested intervention that works in partnership with local schools, health professionals and social services. Our National Specialist Family Service doesn’t exist to simply help parents to detox and remain drug and alcohol free, it supports them in sustaining that wellbeing, in developing parenting skills and in caring for their child in a safe and happy space. The focus should be on giving women the support they need to break free from abuse and addiction, not punishing them for surviving it.

No mother should be held responsible for the violence, coercion or manipulation of her abuser. Family courts have a vital role in protecting children, but that must include recognising the realities of domestic abuse and ensuring victims are treated with fairness, compassion and understanding, not blame.

Comment now Comments Add Metro as a Preferred Source on Google Add as preferred source