A Two-year Market Run Let Them Retire At 62. Claiming Social Security To Protect The Gains Could Cost Them For Life.

The post A Two-Year Market Run Let Them Retire at 62. Claiming Social Security to Protect the Gains Could Cost Them for Life. appeared first on 24/7 Wall St..

The Couple Who Feels Like They Just Won

A healthy married couple in their early 60s opens two 401(k) statements that barely resemble the accounts they held two years ago. The S&P 500 has climbed roughly 45% over that stretch, making early retirement feel not only possible but overdue. One fear keeps interrupting the celebration. If the market turns, they may have to sell stocks after the fall. Claiming Social Security at 62 would bring two monthly checks into the house and leave more of the portfolio untouched.

The instinct makes sense. The remedy deserves a harder look. They are trying to insure a volatile portfolio with a Social Security decision that can follow them for life.

A Temporary Fear Meets a Permanent Reduction

For someone whose full retirement age (FRA) is 67, claiming at 62 can shrink the monthly benefit by approximately 30%. The decrease does not disappear at age 67. It remains attached to the benefit. Suppose the higher earner would receive $2,400 a month at 67. Filing at 62 cuts that to roughly $1,680. Waiting until 70 lifts it to approximately $2,976 before future cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs). The 8% annual delayed-retirement credits begin after 67 and stop at 70. Social Security applies a different early-filing formula between 62 and 67.

COLAs do not provide a reason to claim early. Social Security adjusts the underlying benefit after age 62 whether the worker has filed or not. Claiming determines the base on which those increases build. The higher earner’s decision also reaches beyond one lifetime. Delaying can strengthen the benefit left to a surviving spouse, while filing early can reduce that future income. For a healthy couple, the check meant to protect this year’s portfolio could become the smaller check supporting one spouse in their 80s.

They Do Not Have to Claim Together

The choice is not limited to turning on both checks at 62 or waiting until 70 for both. The lower earner could claim first, bringing some reliable income into the household while the higher earner waits. That reduces pressure on the portfolio without giving up the strongest available survivor benefit.

The higher earner’s delayed credits do not increase the regular spousal benefit while both are alive. They can increase what the surviving spouse receives later. That makes the larger record the one most worth protecting. A staggered strategy will not fit every couple, but it solves a problem the all-or-nothing framing creates. One check can support the early retirement. The other can keep growing for the years when only one spouse may remain.

Let the Portfolio Solve the Portfolio Problem

Sequence-of-returns risk is real. A severe decline during the first few years of retirement can do lasting damage when withdrawals force shares to be sold at depressed prices. Claiming Social Security early is one way to reduce those withdrawals. It is not the only one.

A reserve holding perhaps two or three years of planned withdrawals in cash, Treasury bills, or short-term bonds can give stocks time to recover. The exact amount depends on the couple’s spending and comfort with risk, but the purpose is straightforward: the next several mortgage, insurance, and travel payments should not depend on what the S&P 500 does next month.

That buffer handles the temporary market problem without automatically shrinking the higher earner’s lifetime benefit. Portfolio withdrawals used for the bridge still carry their own costs. Traditional 401(k) and IRA distributions are generally taxable. Before 65, they can affect income-based health-insurance assistance. Later, a large income year can raise Medicare premiums through the two-year lookback.

The bridge therefore needs to be modeled in spendable dollars, not simply read from the account balance.

The Market Gain Creates Planning Room

Using retirement assets before Social Security begins can reduce future required minimum distributions (RMDs) and create room for carefully sized Roth conversions. It may also leave fewer withdrawals stacked on top of Social Security once the benefits start. That does not make spending the portfolio automatically superior. Poor health, limited savings, debt, or a strong preference for keeping investments intact may support an earlier claim. The market rally gave this couple more choices. It did not settle which one is best.

Before Either Spouse Files

Three comparisons can keep a good market run from producing a rushed decision:

1. Calculate the annual spending gap after pensions, part-time income, and cash reserves. That is the amount the portfolio or Social Security must fill.
2. Compare staggered claiming dates, especially an earlier benefit for the lower earner and a later one for the higher earner. Include the eventual survivor check.
3. Stress-test the portfolio against a substantial early decline. If the plan survives without selling stocks at distressed prices, fear of the next downturn should carry less weight in the claiming decision.

The market gave them permission to retire. It did not set their Social Security date.

The post A Two-Year Market Run Let Them Retire at 62. Claiming Social Security to Protect the Gains Could Cost Them for Life. appeared first on 24/7 Wall St..