Join our FREE personalized newsletter for news, trends, and insights that matter to everyone in America

Newsletter
New

The White House Choreographed A Victory Lap. Trump Veered Off Script.

Card image cap


President Donald Trump was supposed to go to Capitol Hill on Wednesday and spike the football. Instead, he fumbled.

The president abruptly scuttled plans to sign a bipartisan housing bill that would have been a boon to Republicans desperate for campaign trail affordability wins. Trump’s announcement that he wouldn’t sign it until the Senate passes voting overhauls that he’s championed came after his own staff spent the morning taking a very public victory lap ahead of the housing bill’s expected signing.

It’s the latest example of a president seemingly indifferent to the political realities of the Senate and unable to stay on message ahead of an expectedly close midterm contest in which voters list cost-of-living as a top concern.

“This is a bipartisan bill that would’ve given the White House a nice victory,” said David Urban, a Republican strategist who advised Trump’s 2016 campaign. “And listen, it’s still going to become law. It’s not like the president is going to veto it. But it would have been a great story today.”

The housing bill — which passed with 358 votes in the House and 85 in the Senate — included a proposal intended to lower the cost of housing by banning institutional investors from purchasing single family homes, which Trump touted in his State of the Union. White House legislative affairs director James Braid worked for weeks to iron out differences between the House and Senate version. Press secretary Karoline Leavitt and former deputy chief of staff James Blair heralded the signing on Wednesday.

But Trump’s fixation on the SAVE America Act, which he believes is key to protecting election integrity, upended the stagecraft. Instead of spending the day celebrating, aides and lobbyists were left scrambling to pick up the pieces, trying to divine why Trump had changed course and what it all meant for the future of the housing bill.

Trump did not publicly address the issue or the sudden change during his brief stop on Capitol Hill where he joined Senate Republicans for lunch, which turned into a venting session that left the two sides no closer to a detente. Speaking in the Oval Office later, he said there was “no compromise” he was open to on the SAVE America Act to get it included in a third reconciliation bill Hill Republicans are working on.

The about face comes as White House is attempting to pivot away from the unpopular Iran war toward domestic issues and remind voters of the administration’s accomplishments. Beyond the housing bill, Trump is expected to give a rally-style speech on the National Mall Wednesday night. There are also plans to celebrate the one-year anniversary of the Big Beautiful Bill, which Trump signed last July 4, “to remind the public that President Trump delivered on his promise to cut taxes - and Democrats opposed it every step of the way,” a senior administration official told POLITICO on Tuesday. 

Instead, some Trump allies, including proponents of the SAVE America Act, argue the reversal squandered a day that should have been about affordability and stepped on a news cycle that had otherwise handed the party a gift in the form of dyed-in-the-wool socialists winning Democratic primaries in New York.

“The SAVE Act is important and deserves to become law,” said a person close to the White House, who like others in this story was granted anonymity to share details of private conversations. “But delaying a major housing package that would deliver real relief to American families risks cutting off our nose to spite our face.”

Asked for comment on the reversal, the White House referred to the president's remarks in the Oval Office Wednesday, which did not explain the change of course.

Trump’s U-turn followed a threat Tuesday from Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) to “shut the floor down” if the Senate didn’t pass the SAVE America Act.

Other supporters of the SAVE America Act, which includes a requirement for voter ID and documentary proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote, said Wednesday’s move was classic Trump — using every bit of leverage he has to drag along a recalcitrant Senate.

“Look, it's going to move forward. It's going to be signed. I don't think that's a question,” said a second person close to the White House and Senate conservatives. But Senate leaders “have just been telling him all the bullshit excuses that they've been using and gaslighting him about the SAVE America Act, and he's getting pissed.”

Several Trump allies immediately took to X to back the president up in his decision. MAGA influencer Alex Bruesewitz called on the Senate to “step up and deliver for the American people” by passing the SAVE America Act, while podcaster Jack Posobiec called the legislation “critical for the future of the nation.”

“He is committed to passing it and is willing to go as hard as possible with the Senate to do so,” Posobiec said. “They should start listening.”

But inside the White House the “vibes are in shambles” said a former Trump administration official, granted anonymity to describe the mood.

The president could always veto the housing bill — if he really believes the SAVE America Act needs to pass first.

But Trump also does not need to sign the bill for it to become law. A bill sent to the president becomes law 10 days after he officially receives it from House GOP leadership, which hasn’t happened yet, according to four people with direct knowledge of the matter.

Still, allowing it to become law without his signature would deny Republicans a chance to crow at a signing ceremony — which is what Wednesday was supposed to be about.

“The president took what should have been a political lay-up — not to mention a substantively good policy move — and turned it into yet another boneheaded own goal,” said a third person close to the White House. “Even if it does become law, he’s now taken a lot of the steam out of an effort that could have shown the GOP is taking the cost of living crunch seriously. Now, it’s tarnished.”

Jordain Carney and Meredith Lee Hill contributed to this report.