Join our FREE personalized newsletter for news, trends, and insights that matter to everyone in America

Newsletter
New

The Industry’s Quiet First Line Of Defense

Card image cap

Most professions get credit for what people can see them do. A surgeon’s skill is visible in the outcome. The engineer’s work shows up in the bridge that holds. In real estate, the closing table tends to get all the attention, from the signatures and the handshakes to the transfer of keys. What doesn’t get nearly enough attention is everything that happened before that moment to make sure the transaction was legitimate in the first place.

That’s the part of a title agent’s job that almost nobody talks about.

Real estate closings look, from the outside, like a documentation and logistics exercise. Paperwork is compiled, funds are moved, signatures are gathered, and the deed changes hands. That’s the visible part of the job, but it’s genuinely not the most important part. What most buyers, sellers, and even lending partners never see is the parallel process running underneath every transaction: a trained, systematic effort to detect fraud before it can do damage.

Although the industry doesn’t talk enough about this, it probably should.

Forgery is more sophisticated than mist people assume

Forged documents have been part of real estate fraud for as long as real estate has existed. What’s changed is the form. One of the more brazen schemes involves the forging of a deed—recording it at the county courthouse and then attempting to sell a property the fraudster doesn’t own. Vacant land and unoccupied homes are particularly attractive targets because the real owner is less likely to notice until significant damage has already been done.

Escrow agents are trained to catch this kind of fraud and the training is more granular than it sounds. They’re taught to examine signatures across multiple documents within a transaction and compare them for consistency, to identify transaction profiles that match known fraud patterns, and to dig into chain-of-title records when something doesn’t track logically. It’s painstaking work, and it doesn’t announce itself. When it succeeds, the closing simply proceeds normally. When it’s skipped or rushed, a buyer may end up holding a worthless deed to a property they don’t legally own.

A variation on this involves family members such as adult children attempting to act on behalf of an elderly parent through forged power of attorney documents, or in more direct cases, by attempting to impersonate the owner outright. Agents encountering high-risk scenarios will often obtain and verify the power of attorney themselves rather than rely on what’s been presented, which is exactly the kind of friction that deters opportunistic fraud.

Wire fraud is now the bigger threat

If forgery represents the older, more analog strain of real estate fraud, wire fraud is the version that emerged when the industry moved away from checks and physical cash. Business Email Compromise (BEC) involves fraudsters intercepting or impersonating email communications to redirect wire transfers to accounts they control, typically targeting the buyer’s down payment or closing funds. The losses, when these schemes work, tend to be large and extremely difficult to recover.

The defense against BEC isn’t a single tool but rather, a layered approach. Title professionals now routinely use encrypted communications and multi-factor authentication as baseline protections, but the more important work is behavioral. Agents train every party in a transaction on what legitimate fund-transfer instructions look like, when those instructions will and won’t change, and how to verify any deviation from the established process through a channel that doesn’t involve email. That last piece is critical. A fraudster who has already compromised an email thread can mimic a legitimate message convincingly. An out-of-band phone call to a verified number is considerably harder to fake.

Some firms have also moved to insure funds held in and disbursed from escrow as an additional layer of protection, a backstop that may help create a measure of recovery if a scheme does succeed despite best efforts.

The gap between perception and reality

Most people who close on a home come away thinking their title agent’s job was to gather paperwork, manage the escrow account and conduct the signing. While that’s an accurate description of the visible work it’s also an incomplete description of the job.

The fraud prevention function runs concurrently with all of it, largely invisible to everyone at the table: the signature analysis, the chain-of-title review, the BEC training, the wire verification protocols. It’s not glamorous work. It rarely produces a dramatic moment. Usually, the outcome is simply that nothing bad happened, which is the best possible result and the hardest one to get credit for.

For an industry that spends considerable energy communicating its value, the protective function of title professionals is probably the most underexplained. There’s a real conversation to be had with consumers, lenders and real estate partners about what title agents actually prevent, not just what they facilitate. The work is already happening. It just needs the audience to understand it.

Jay Roberts is the Chief Technology Officer of Florida Agency Network and Premier Data Services. 
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of HousingWire’s editorial department and its owners. To contact the editor responsible for this piece: zeb@hwmedia.com.